🔗 Share this article

A Danish citizen has been found guilty of sharing nude segments from protected films and television shows on the social media platform Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement report reviewed by media outlets, the unnamed individual shared 347 video excerpts of nude content in a Reddit group he managed, which were then viewed 4.2 million times.

The country's police confirm he has been handed a seven-month deferred sentence for violating copyright laws.

Legal analysts explain the defendant was charged under a rarely-used provision in Denmark's copyright law, with the court finding that by removing the footage out of their original context, the man had harmed the artists' "moral rights".

He has additionally been found guilty of sharing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted data.

From spring 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted adult clips including over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the forum he was a administrator of.

According to the Danish copyright protection organization The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had more than 6,000 members and participants were prompted to request clips of particular actors.

In 2023, advocates reported the case to the police on behalf of the impacted actors, filmmakers and production companies, which led to the subreddit being shut down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of the actresses whose nude scenes were circulated in the community, told Danish broadcasters at the time she felt there was a distinction between being seen naked in a film and being shown on Reddit.

The performer stated the uploads constituted "exploitation".

'An important message'

The man was detained in fall 2024 and pleaded guilty to the allegations last month.

In a comment following the ruling, TRA head Maria Fredenslund said the decision sent an "significant" signal "that violations of creators' rights has consequences".

The ruling is considered unprecedented in Denmark for its application of the "moral rights" section of the national copyright law, which states an creator's work cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Intellectual property expert Dr Alina Trapova informed the media the legal matter was "rare" for its focus on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

The extent to which the case could affect nations abroad is uncertain.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the integrity of one's creative output might be tempered with with greater ease".